XV BILDERBERG
LE GROUPE BILDERBERG
Ces orientations conditionnent les décisions des institutions
"Nous arrivons vers l'émergence d'une transformation globale. Tout ce dont nous avons besoin,
c'est de LA CRISE MAJEURE et le peuple acceptera le nouvel ordre mondial" . (David Rockefeller)
Cette organisation secrète fut créée en mai 1954 à l'hôtel de Bilderberg (d'où son appellation) à Oosterbeek aux Pays-Bas, à l'invitation du Prince Bernhard des Pays-Bas (décéde le 01.12.2004 à 93 ans), co-fondateur du Groupe avec David Rockefeller. Le président est un ancien secrétaire général de l'OTAN (1984-1988), Lord Carrington. Elle est composée de magnats de la haute finance et d'hommes politiques importants. Ses buts principaux sont l'institution d'un gouvernement mondial et d'une armée globale sous le couvert de l'ONU.
Un comité consultatif composé d'une commission de direction (avec 24 européens et 15 américains) décide des personnes à inviter à leurs rencontres. Cependant toutes les personnes présentes ne sont pas des initiés, elles peuvent être aussi seulement des représentants d'un groupement d'intérêt ou d'autres personnes. Le Groupe de Bilderberg est sans doute le plus puissant des réseaux d'influence. Il rassemble des personnalités de tous les pays, leaders de la politique, de l'économie, de la finance, des médias, des responsables de l'armée ou des services secrets, ainsi que quelques scientifiques et universitaires.
Très structuré, le Groupe de Bilderberg est organisé en 3 cercles successifs:
- Le "cercle extérieur" est assez large et comprend 80% des participants aux réunions. Les membres de ce cercle ne connaissent qu'une partie des stratégies et des buts réels de l'organisation.
- Le deuxième cercle (cercle intérieur), beaucoup plus fermé, est le Steering Committee (Comité de Direction). Il est constitué d'environ 35 membres, exclusivement européens et américains. Ils connaissent à 90% les objectifs et stratégies du Groupe. Les membres américains sont également membres du CFR.
- Le cercle le plus central est le Bilderberg Advisory Committee (Comité consultatif). Il comprend une dizaine de membres, les seuls à connaître intégralement les stratégies et les buts réels de l'organisation.
Le Groupe de Bilderberg est un véritable gouvernement mondial occulte. Au cours de ses réunions, des décisions stratégiques essentielles y sont prises, hors des institutions démocratiques où ces débats devraient normalement avoir lieu. Les orientations stratégiques décidées par le Groupe de Bilderberg peuvent concerner le début d'une guerre, l'initiation d'une crise économique ou au contraire d'une phase de croissance, les fluctuations monétaires ou boursières majeures, les alternances politiques dans les "démocraties", les politiques sociales, ou encore la gestion démographique de la planète. Ces orientations conditionnent ensuite les décisions des institutions subalternes comme le G8 ou les gouvernements des états. Jacques Bordiot résume ainsi, dans son livre "Une main cachée dirige", les principaux sujets proposés au cours de ces discrètes délibérations:
- Les problèmes financiers internationaux
- La liberté d'émigration et d'immigration
- La libre circulation des produits sans entraves douanières
- L'union économique internationale
- La constitution d'une force de police internationale avec suppression des armées nationales
- La création d'un Parlement international
- La limitation de la souveraineté de états déléguée à l'ONU ou à tout autre gouvernement supranational
Les membres du Groupe de Bilderberg s'appellent eux-mêmes les "Bilderbergers". Ils sont choisis uniquement par cooptation. Le Groupe de Bilderberg se réunit une fois par an pendant environ 4 jours. Les réunions ont lieu chaque année au printemps dans une ville différente, mais toujours dans des châteaux ou des hôtels luxueux, entourés d'un parc ou situés en pleine nature, et si possible équipés d'un golf. Les réunions sont protégées par plusieurs centaines de policiers, militaires, et membres des services spéciaux du pays d'accueil. Si la réunion a lieu dans un hôtel, celui-ci est vidé de ses occupants une semaine avant l'arrivée des Bilderbergers. Les invités sont déposés par un ballet d'hélicoptères noirs et par des limousines aux vitres fumées avec la lettre "B" sur le parre-brise.
Les discussions se tiennent à huis-clos. Quelques journalistes dévoués à la "pensée unique" peuvent être parfois présent, mais rien ne doit filtrer des discussions. Il est interdit de prendre des notes ou de faire des déclarations à la presse. Mais quelques photographes arrivent parfois à prendre des photos à l'extérieur, au moment de l'arrivée des invités.
La presse a fait le silence sur les révélations de leurs fréquentes réunions secrètes, si bien que le grand public ignore tout des véritables desseins des politiciens et de financiers qui se réunissent, périodiquement, pour déterminer l'avenir du monde et resserrer leur contrôle sur les rouages essentiels des organismes supranationaux. La conférence de 1976 fut annulée après le scandale des pots-de-vin de Lockheed, qui provoqua la démission du prince Bernhard de Pays-Bas; mais la tradition fut reprise, l'année suivante, à Torquay, en Grande-Bretagne, les 21,22 et 23 avril 1977, sous la présidence de Lord Home, ancien Premier ministre britannique (Sir Alec Douglas-Home). Le daily Mirror avait dévoilé, trois semaines plus tôt, le 4 avril exactement, les noms des personnalités qui devaient y participer. Parmi elles, naturellement, le financier David Rockefeller et Henry Kissinger mais aussi, le président Giscard d'estaing (qui n'y est finalement pas allé à cause du grand bruit que le canard enchaîné a fait sur la réunion) . De son côté, la canard Enchaîné indiquait, le 13 avril, que parmi les invités figuraient: Helmut Schmidt; Niarchos, le célèbre armateur grec; Agnelli, le "patron" de Fiat; le Premier ministre britannique; le président de la Chase Manhattan Bank; etc. Coïncidence: la réunion de Torquay précedait de qulques jours seulement deux sommêts de ce mois à Londres, l'un des "grands" de l'économie mondiale et l'autre des membres de l'OTAN.
LIENS AVEC LES AUTRES ORGANISATIONS
Les liens qui unissent les trois sociétés secrètes (Bilderberg Group, C.F.R., Trilatéral) sont très étroits, ce qui explique la présence de nombreux affiliés du Bilderberg Group au sein du C.F.R. ou de la Trilatérale. Le financier Rockefeller anime les trois organisations. D'autres personnes sont affiliées, en même temps, à deux ou trois de ces sociétés. Par exemple: georges Bush (CFR, Trilatérale); Zbigniew Brzezinski (CFR, Trilatérale, Bilderberg); Henry Kissinger (CFR, Trilatérale, Bilderberg); Robert McNamara (CFR, Trilatérale, Bilderberg); Giovanni Agnelli (Trilatérale, Bilderberg); Baron Edmond de Rothschild (Trilatérale, Bilderberg); Thierry de Montbrial, président de l'Institut Français des Relation Internationales (Trilatérale, Bilderberg); Jean-Claude Casanova (Trilatérale, Bilderberg), homme de confiance de Raymond Barre (Trilatérale) et le dernier en date: Lionel Jospin (Bilderberg); etc.
Ces membres particuliers membres de plusieurs organisations et qui sont d'ailleurs les plus puissants font partie du "cercle intérieur", le "cercle extérieur" étant l'ensemble des hommes de la finance et de la politique qui sont séduits par l'idée de l'instauration d'un gouvernement mondial qui régulera tout (au niveau politique et économique), sans être conscient des véritables motifs qui poussent le "cercle intérieur" à mettre en place un gouvernement mondial, ce sont des "marionnettes" qui sont utilisées par le cercle intérieur parce que ses membres ne peuvent pas tout changer à eux seuls: ainsi le cercle intérieur et le cercle extérieur agissent en concert mais pas pour les mêmes raisons: le cercle extérieur par désir de s'enrichir oet/ou par la croyance qu'un gouvernement unique apportera plus de paix et de cohésion qu'une multitude de petits pays; le cercle intérieur dont les membres sont déjà riches et puissants et dont les visées sont toutes autres puisqu' elles sont idéologiques.
La Commission Trilatérale (qui regroupe à peu près 200 personnes de l'élite industrielle et économique des Etats-Unis, du Japon et de l'Europe de l'Ouest) est le bras politique des Bilderbergers et a pour but d'accélérer le processus de mise en place du gouvernement unique. Ces décisions seront habilement retransmises aux peuples par l'intermédiaire de ses membres qui ont la main mise sur les plus grands organismes médiatiques de la planète.
SOURCES ET LIENS
The Bilderberg archives
Un peu d'histoire :
Metasystems
Bilderberg's secret agenda 2005
15Feb05 - by Marek Tysis - Bilderberg exclusive
"Part I: 2005 and the Brave New World of Bilderberg
On the eve of a triumphant journey by Mr Bush to the soil of the old continent, preceded by Mrs Condoleeza Rice’s trip, all indicators show that Europe's leaders are only pretending in their 'opposition' to the US.
In Nice (South of France), Mr. Rumsfeld managed to persuade Europeans to train and finance thousands of new Iraqi police. NATO is now to redeploy in Afghanistan and help the US military rebuild this country. Saudi Arabia has seen its first local elections after the great success of the Iraqi ones. Ukraine was holding its own at the end of last year with the subversive help from some US CIA ‘s backed organizations.
A so calling “best US informed man” and former Reagan’s aide named Jack Wheeler (see in worldnetdaily.com who I am referring to…) is seriously suggesting Mr G. W. Bush should receive the Nobel Peace Prize for his eminent role in establishing democracy in these countries.
Meanwhile, Bush is referring to the courage and the writings of a former Russian resister, Natan Sharansky. However, Israeli Barry Chamish believes this cold war hero was in fact a KGB informer. So on this sinister stage where the blind follow the lies in a mirror, we may certainly fear the worst direction from these leaders.
The Power of Democracy - a Quick Look
The first thing to examine when they are speaking of democracy is to see which democracy they (the US administration) are wanting to install.
In their mouths democracy is sounding as a real people’s democracy (no real intention from my part to write ‘popular’ democracy which is, as everybody knows, another body).
In fact a quick examination of the guys they are following and helping is showing these guys are attracted by the European model or wanting to evade an external influence. This is really evident in the Ukrainian case, where Yutschenko (married to an American woman) is politically binded to Yulia Timochenko, an Ukrainian billionaire, whose past was in business in Russian petroleum and gas. We have the oil and we have the democracy now. But is it really a democracy where the people in the street are having a word to say? Apparently yes, since the orange revolution, but we may not forget the river of money that flowed out of the pockets of Soros ‘s foundations as well as from American foundations (Freedom’s house directed by former CIA director Woosley, New Endowment for democracy known as a CIA relais since its implication in the Venezuelian coup d’état.
Up to now, the structure of Ukrainian power and democracy is based on some ploutocrat looking like a MAFIA mob. The difference with the former is that they are now a Western looking mob.
The Georgian revolution funded by Soros ‘s organizations is in difficulties. Georgia is situated south of the Caspian Sea and Putin is showing no sign of abandon in Chétchénia at the opposite (see his declarations in Autschwitz against terrorism minimizing the US). First minister of Georgia recently died of Carbon Dioxide poisoning when sleeping and he was the right arm of the president of this country. Russians have no intentions of moving from their Georgian base as well from Sebastopol, in Ukrainian Crimea where the Russian South See Navy stands.
Naturally, The Caucases are known to have a lot of oil.
Democracy in Iraq is going to lead this country (containing petroleum) to have a Shia governement .Violence is not to ease soon. Difference between Iraq and Georgia has to be found in the localization: Iraq doesn't belong to the Caucase basin but to the Great MiddleEast where democracy (democracy is liking oil as you noticed it immediately at the first glance).
Great Middle East , as well Saudi Arabia where the first local elections were held ( in absence of women…not invited to vote).
Next surprise will come out in Lebanon where the UN asked Syria to leave the country. Jumblatt and Aoun in next polling will make the difference, thanks to America. Naturally , Syria is threatened regularly of American intervention. And assassinations will happen.
Israel is a big part of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) plan: two countries side by side and the entrance of the two countries in the European union once peace is acquired.
So we may discriminate two policies having the same oil control target.
1.Eurasia policy for the north of Europe (following Brzezinsky theories) 2.Great Middle east policy for the South of Europe.
We move to the Bilderberg 2005 agenda
These policies will be again on the table at next Bilderberg meeting for sure. Europe is in competition about commerce in the Maghreb (Tunisia, Marocco, Lybia. Egypt is fully in the hands of the US interests As well as Jordania and..Israel.)
Now, a more difficult task is awaiting Europeans about competitiveness and the Lisbon agenda. In fact, the entrance of low level cost price countries in 2004 in Europe will displace the benefit of European aid policies towards the East, leading to more economic difficulties in the south (France, Germany, Benelux, Italy etc.).
NATO and the European Constitution
The constitution of Europe to be voted this year in Europe and next year in England is having in its chapter III, a whole commerce code meaning an end of European Social security with Frits Bolkenstein’s directive fleshed out by the text.
This constitution is authorizing legally the NATO to be the only official frame of European’s future defense forces. (First part of the text). In one sentence, Europe’s future is definitively cemented in the wedding with the American direction.
This is to be voted “democrately”, but with the respective governments hiding these important facts.
As a matter of confirmation of the influence of NATO upon Europe, last December was the inclusion of Turkey inside Europe imposed by America and decided by Europe. This shameful decision was pushed by the commissioner to “broadening” of Europe, Mr Gunther Verheugen, member of Bilderberg. A contact inside the IFRI told me this was requested with force by the USA above all protestations possible.
Where is the “democracy” in all this?
In next article we will have a deeper look upon the Iranian question, the consequences of Turkey entrance, Eurasia, China and the weapon debate, Money and the real plutocratic democracy role in a next future.
Part II - Bloomsbury and Hell's Bells
Raymond Fodsick was a Woodrow Wilson’s friend and the most influencial man of his generation along with Colonel House. In company of one of his pupils, Beardsley Ruml, and the help of John Davison Rockefeller III, they established the “Memorial and the General Education Board” to study the population growth problems.
Ruml was in contact since the 1920 ‘s with Graham Wallas, a founder of the Fabian Society. Together, they established with the help of the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Fund, a rostrum of Social Science in Bloomsbury under control of the Fabian Society. Ruml was too a member of the National Planning Association where were sitting Felix Frankfurter, Eric Johnston , future founder of the Atlantic Institute, Norman Cousins, etc.. all of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) a private US foreign policy club.
Fodsick was a partisan of “Internationalist “ organizations. To control the government. He obtained from John Davison Rockefeller III the means to strengthen the “Institute of Government Research” which with the help of Robert Brookings a few years later became the “Brookings Institute”.
Fodsick, with Thomas W. Lamont and the infamous Colonel House founded the “ Council on Foreign Relations “ and the “Foreign Policy Association”( in this case in company of Felix Frankfurter and Paul Warburg)
So, we may deduce from this: The establishment of the CFR was to control the US government. All Institutes of Fodsick including the work he did on the Brooking Institution and the Foreign Policy Association was leading to this goal. All identical Institutes in foreign countries led to this target too including the Royal Institute for International Afairs (RIIA) in England and other institutions founded abroad. So when in the FAQ on the websites of the Trilateral, CFR we see: “Is the Trilateral a plot?” with the answer :” Not at all” we are authorized, frankly, to laugh.
This plan intends to guide the US ‘s government actions as well as foreign governments' actions with respect to the interests of the richest of the American riches dynasties or powerful European and worldwide plutocratic groups .
This is an invisible hand. You ‘ll never directly see the hand. You see the CFR’s recommendations and reports and you‘ll see the congressmen vote. You never see the hand guiding them. The same with Bilderberg and Europe, 99% of people living in an EU which was born at Bilderberg have never heard of it. But the Bilderberg’s reports are not available for the public although the names of the members of these caucuses are never quoted.
“In late 1952, Josef Retinger went to America to try the idea out on his American contacts.Among others, he saw such old friends as Averell Harriman, David Rockefeller, and Bedell Smith, then director of the CIA. After Retinger explained his proposal, Smith said “ Why the Hell didn’t you come to me in the first place?” .He quickly referred Retinger to C.D. Jackson, who was about to become Eisenhower‘s special assistant for warfare…in May 1954, the first conference was held in the hotel de Bilderberg..” (The chairman, John Mc Cloy, the making of the American Establishmenté by Kai Bird’s as quoted in 'Who’s Who of the Elite' by Robert Gaylon Ross)
Averell Harriman was a Yale 'Skull & Bones' secret society member and a former associate of Prescott Bush (GW's grandad) in his Nazi collaborating oil business. McCloy was responsible for the bombing upon Germany during the war as well as an OSS (forerunner of the CIA) officer.
Asked why Auschwitz was never bombed (or the railroad leading to the camp) he answered: “If we did something in favor of the Jews, the Greeks would have asked the same for them”.
In my idea there were not so much Greeks interned in comparison of the Jews and this is an historical fact that factories with US interests were never bombed in Germany, this was no accident. The camps were providing the workforce needed for the US interests in Germany at a real low cost for the American profiteers and there is no question to contest that money has no smell.
Harriman became the European responsible for the George Marshall ‘s plan in Europe, while McCloy was director honorary for the CFR, president of the Ford Foundation, director at the Chase Manhattan Bank, member of Bilderberg etc…and a member of the Warren Commission about the murder of President Kennedy (curiously he and Allen Dulles were members of the Permindex company quoted by Garrison, in company of general Walker and the landlord Byrd of the Texas book depository).
A European Democratic Revolution
In his book “ The great Chessboard”, Zbigniew Brzezinski is telling us: “Europe is the geostrategical fundamental stronghold position for America. The Atlantic Alliance is authorizing America to have a political influence and a military weight upon the continent…If Europe increases, this will directly benefit American influence…”
Brzezinski goes on “ Western Europe is staying in a large measure an American Protectorate and his states are remembering us who were the vassals and tribute payers of the old empires”
“Europe has to solve the problem caused by his social redistribution system which is too heavy and preventing European capacity of initiatives”
Attempt to crush social security
Thus, for Brzezinski, the social security net in Europe, a great post war blessing in Britain, is paralyzing the capacity of Europe to expand and find a common sense in European patriotism. Naturally, America is impatient to have more power and influence upon the continent. So pressure is increasing through Bilderberg to develop and increase Europe. This is explaining all through Europe these initiatives having as target to dismantle the whole social security system under the one of other economical or social pretext.
The plain fact that all people of European nations paid for social security through taxation does not occur to Brzezinski.
Valery Giscard d’ Estaing (Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg) is the so called “father” of the European Constitution and is a real close friend of Kissinger. His constitutional will be written in marble, if accepted. The NATO heart of Europe as well that the social regression in the whole Europe. Brzezinski is not even thinking to the social troubles or revolutions his initiative might lead to… My inside source in the IFRI told me that the Bolkenstein directive will find full force on July 15, 2005 as well as the Investment Agreement.
You know what is MAI. (Multilateral Agreement on Investments). Everybody thought this social monstruosity was definitively put in the dustbin. Error, the beast is coming back.
In the same vein, the integration of Turkey in Europe will permit US imperialism to have a strong hand upon the south of the Caspian Sea, as well as having an influence upon the states of the east side of the Mediterranean basin. This will achieve the US “democratic” move on this region while the Western part will be submitted to the action of NGO’s towards more democracy as a last year article from the German Marshall Fund in the paper “ Le Monde”instructively showed us.
In Short, a subversive hurricane is about to blow upon Europe and its suburbs in the next few years with politics and social consequences not yet studied by this morning’s magicians. Bilderberg 2005 calls these “social enhancements”.
Iran Russia and China
What about Iran? The point is that Iran is a regional power, able to work with Russia and China together and turning it to a valid opposition to the American Empire in Eurasia.
If we remember well, the Paalavi’s dynasty was thrown out of power in Iran in the year 1979 when America decided his willingness to make Iran a regional power equipped with atomic weapons was not supported by American regional intentions. So, they preferred to work with the backward minds of Ayatollah Khomeyni, but Khomeyni was not intending to work with the friends of Israel. So, America encouraged Saddam ‘s Iraq to engage a terrible war against its neighbor.
Saddam was a close friend to America then, although he was not practicing “democracy”.
Now, 25 years later, the same state is having the same objectives that the Shah in Shah. A big mistake having been done, Iran is again at the feet of America with no intention at all to let America dominate Eurasia. As Russia and China have the same goals, they all three powers have the possibility to block the American expansion.
Nuclear games to play today
The gain goal being not to prevent Iran to have the atomic weapon but well to prevent Iran to be a regional power in any case, the USA are intended to dismantle Iran from the inside, having not enough military forces to invade and submit Teheran. This country is having oil, naturally And that is helping America to try to convert these Muslims to he virtues of the American democratic way of life.
The interests of China are going towards the oil of central Asia, in the same time the interests of Turkey and Iran are pointing in the same direction. The Alliance of Iran and China in petroleum matters are preventing USA from controlling the tab on the Chinese oil. Naturally an alliance between Iran, China and Russia would exclude America from the Kazakhstan oil fields and will not tolerate the presence of pipeline leading to the Mediterranean region, which is what Washington wants.
So to the insistence of the US threats, Iran will answer with more Aggressiveness in the central Asian oil fields States.
Limitations on Chinese Ambitions
As specially defined by the Brzezinski doctrine, no country or groups of country will be allowed to challenge the hyperpower status of the USA.
America has implicitly allowed China to dump its money since the years 1980 against a limited place of this country in the New World Order, the New American Empire. But now, China wants to take its natural place in the South Asiatic Region.
Economically, China is a success story and the end of textile quotas is permitting China to invade the European markets. This is weakening the European textile industries and weakening the buying power of European money.
Logically, sales of European weapons are to counter balance this trade and to permit China to have the adequate military forces equal to its power status. But this means too that the policy of China will no more be in the hands of Washington, and that in a near future, Taiwan might just be invaded. And Japan forced to acquire atomic weapons too in order to defend itself.
Condoleeza Rice as well as George W. Bush will try to limit theses European sales. With some disgust they did not appreciate the recent position of Mr. Blair on this question. Maybe Tony Blair is no more the lap-dog of mr Bush? Probably, China is going to know some restrictions on vital matters as oil, steel, strategic materials and obliged to accept to reconsider its yuan value or to be considered as a former member of international WTO etc..
Naturally, America is a net borrower and will be obliged to stop to borrow. Not to sink before a flow of Chinese paper coming back for immediate refund, USA would be obliged to devaluate its money from one day to the other, even if America is showing good signs of activity. This would mean ruin for all Asia and America. But America is able to turn towards its European allies and, within a few years, its debt could be patched up.
In short, to limit the Asiatic risks, China will be forced to freeze activities and certainly through the revaluation of the yuan. This will be in a more harder way presented to China by the Allies. Bilderberg 2005 will be considering this deeply.
China and Russia
Naturally, after the CIA aided 'Ukraine joins West' affair, Russia and China are tempted to work together and working with Iran to counterbalance the American penetration of Eurasia. They have already penetrated the South American markets to “free” South America from the non democratic Monroe doctrine. His is “de bonne guerre” and exasperating Washington. Common maneuvers are scheduled and everything is showing that with or without the European weapons, China will be able to repel the American interests in its strategic sphere.
Iran war, to be or not to be?
It will be a matter of provocation. A country that is not America could be tempted of doing the job by its own means. The day after, here will be no more nuclear forces in Iran but a climate of war with a direct implication in Iraq of Teheran’s interests or occidental interests leading a formidable propaganda to push Europe to a war against this country in collaboration with Turkey and the USA. And a secret hope that this country would fall as a cabin as the first European forces are entering the country with the “United Nation” benediction. This would happen in any case after the Iranian elections. Iran would then cease to the obstacle to the American domination of Eurasia.
First Conclusions: the earthquake tension at Bilderberg 2005
Bilderberg 2005 will be a decisive conference. The way Europeans will vote to the Constitutional treaty is vital to our future. Spain is not considering seriously the importance of this vote, and the official propaganda is favoring the “Yes” vote. The “No” vote would oblige them to negotiate in telling the truth about what this poll really represents. They may in this case organize some spectacular incident showing they are not representing democracy but the interests of plutocracy.
As America is fighting for more and more democracy outside its borders, there is less and less freedoms and liberties inside their own borders. (Patriot Acts I & II). What is called democracy is effectively representing the force and influence of a little class of American, European, Turkish, Asiatic elite. This force is helped by a hyper bourgeoisie force working as the waiters of this elite or knowing carefully what not to do and say to upset their masters.
I have presented what should be the master lines of this year ‘s conference, but I may have forgotten some, or exaggerated the importance of others. Anyway you can judge the validity of my analysis in a quite short period of time because Bilderberg plan is all in a rush. A rush that could prove fatal to their plans."